You know, I just read something the other night that bothered me....
Usually I'm a huge fan of sequels, as long as they aren't stupid, useless, or for a movie that would not or does not need another addition (Like Titanic, or Big....for example...Sequels just wouldn't work).
I read an article that seemed highly unlikely, so this may be a rumor at best. Dennis Hopper mentioned the possibility of a Speed sequel...yes....Speed 3.
Honestly, where do you even begin with that. Hopper's character was decapitated in the first one, and a prequel would just be impossible considering how much he's aged. So I ask, if reception was so bad for the first sequel (which isn't great),, why even bother...The original Speed was a great movie...seriously, a great action film......Why tarnish it's name with a third film, which, and many people may agree, is totally unnecessary and also not very exciting?